Enhancement Technologies and Children

In Nico Nortjé & Johan C. Bester (eds.), Pediatric Ethics: Theory and Practice. Springer Verlag. pp. 329-341 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The advent of current and emerging biotechnologies has placed greater levels of control in the hands of parentsParents and prospective parentsParents to shape their children’s physical, cognitiveCognitive, and emotive traits. Ethical questions initially formulated around the selection of embryos or fetuses that have certain desirable versus undesirable traits are now being applied, alongside novel questions, to whether parentsParents have an ethical obligationObligation, or at least a rightRight, to enhance their children to endow them with traits they would not naturally possess. This chapter elucidates how the ethics of enhancementEnhancement have developed, yet differ in important ways, from the ethics of selection. It then canvasses three primary ethical questions regarding enhancementEnhancement: whether parentsParents have an ethical obligationObligation to enhance their children when it is safe, effective, and feasible for them to do so; if not an obligationObligation, whether parentsParents have a rightRight to enhance their children and how their exercise of such a rightRight may alter the nature of the parentParents/child relationship; and what wider societal concerns might mitigate against such a parental rightRight or obligationObligation, at least not without significant socioeconomic restructuring. While this chapter is focused on specific ethical questions raised by the prospect of parentsParents making enhancementEnhancement choices on behalf of their born or preborn children, the conclusion highlights how such questions arise within a wider debate concerning whether biotechnological forms of human enhancementEnhancement should be freely allowed, universally restricted, or permitted on a limited basis for specific traits and purposes.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Free to Decide: The Positive Moral Right to Reproductive Choice.Tess Johnson - 2021 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 31 (3):303-326.
Parental Permission, Childhood Assent, and Shared Decision-Making.S. L. Teti & T. M. Silber - 2021 - In Nico Nortjé & Johan C. Bester (eds.), Pediatric Ethics: Theory and Practice. Springer Verlag. pp. 111-125.
Vaccine Ethics: Ethical Considerations in Childhood Vaccination.J. C. Bester - 2021 - In Nico Nortjé & Johan C. Bester (eds.), Pediatric Ethics: Theory and Practice. Springer Verlag. pp. 437-451.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-10

Downloads
4 (#1,806,247)

6 months
3 (#1,480,774)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jason Eberl
Saint Louis University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references