Foundations of Space-Time Theories: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science

, & (eds.)
University of Minnesota Press (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some Philosophical Prehistory of General Relativity As history, my remarks will form rather a medley. If they can claim any sort of unity (apart from a ...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

1977

ISBN(s)

0816608075   9780816608072

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Chapters

Some pre-history of general relativity.Howard Stein
The causal theory of space-time.John A. Winnie
Some philosophical prehistory of general relativity.  (pages 3-49)Howard Stein

Similar books and articles

Some philosophical prehistory of general relativity.Howard Stein - 1974 - In John Earman, Clark N. Glymour & John J. Stachel (eds.), Foundations of Space-Time Theories: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. University of Minnesota Press. pp. 3-49.
Some pre-history of general relativity.Howard Stein - 1974 - In John Earman, Clark N. Glymour & John J. Stachel (eds.), Foundations of Space-Time Theories: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. University of Minnesota Press.
The causal theory of space-time.John A. Winnie - 1974 - In John Earman, Clark N. Glymour & John J. Stachel (eds.), Foundations of Space-Time Theories: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. University of Minnesota Press.
Book Review:Foundations of Space-Time Theories (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 8) John S. Earman, Clark N. Glymour, John J. Stachel. [REVIEW]Philip L. Quinn - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (2):327-.
EARMAN, J., GLYMOUR, C. & STACHEL, J. "Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science", Vol. VIII: "Foundations of Space-Time Theories". [REVIEW]Graham Nerlich - 1979 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 57:186.
General-Relativistic Covariance.Neil Dewar - 2020 - Foundations of Physics 50 (4):294-318.
Some Philosophical Prehistory of the (Earman-Norton) hole argument.James Owen Weatherall - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 70:79-87.
The Foundations of Spacetime Physics: Philosophical Perspectives.Antonio Vassallo (ed.) - 2022 - New York, NY: Routledge.
Einstein, Newton and the empirical foundations of space time geometry.Robert DiSalle - 1992 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6 (3):181 – 189.
Have we Lost Spacetime on the Way? Narrowing the Gap between General Relativity and Quantum Gravity.Baptiste Le Bihan & Niels Siegbert Linnemann - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 65 (C):112-121.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-06-22

Downloads
88 (#238,737)

6 months
3 (#1,471,783)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

John Earman
University of Pittsburgh
John Stachel
Boston University
Clark Glymour
Carnegie Mellon University

Citations of this work

Underdetermination, Realism, and Reason.John Earman - 1993 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 18 (1):19-38.
Can We Justifiably Assume the Cosmological Principle in Order to Break Model Underdetermination in Cosmology?Claus Beisbart - 2009 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 40 (2):175-205.
Is structural underdetermination possible?Holger Lyre - 2011 - Synthese 180 (2):235 - 247.
Down to Earth Underdetermination.Gordon Belot - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91 (2):456-464.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references