- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Ethical Justifications for Waiving Informed Consent for a Perianal Swab in Critical Burn Care Research
American Journal of Bioethics 24 (4):110-113 (2024)
Abstract
The case (Dawson et al. 2024) describes an Institutional Review Board (IRB) chair who seeks consultation about waiving the requirement that investigators obtain prospective, informed consent for collection of microbiome samples by swabbing the perianal region of severely burned patients shortly after their admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). We argue that it is ethically permissible to waive informed consent requirements for the perianal swab and that the IRB should approve a waiver as permitted by regulations.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
To Swab or Not to Swab: Waiver of Consent to Collect Perianal Specimens from Incapacitated Patients With Severe Burn Injury.Liza Dawson, Andrew D. Ray, Benjamin S. Wilfond & Liza-Marie Johnson - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (4):108-109.
Exceptions to the rule of informed consent for research with an intervention.Susanne Rebers, Neil K. Aaronson, Flora E. van Leeuwen & Marjanka K. Schmidt - 2016 - BMC Medical Ethics 17 (1):1-11.
Informed consent and Anonymous tissue Samples: The case of hiv seroprevalence studies.Loretta M. Kopelman - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (6):525-552.
Research without consent: Exception from and waiver of informed consent in resuscitation research.Michelle H. Biros - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3):361-369.
Update on Waiving Informed Consent in Emergency Research.Charles R. McCarthy - 1995 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5 (4):385-386.
A qualitative study of institutional review board members' experience reviewing research proposals using emergency exception from informed consent.K. B. McClure, N. M. Delorio, T. A. Schmidt, G. Chiodo & P. Gorman - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (5):289-293.
Exception From Informed Consent: How IRB Reviewers Assess Community Consultation and Public Disclosure.Makini Chisolm-Straker, Denise Nassisi, Mohamud R. Daya, Jennifer N. B. Cook, Ilene F. Wilets, Cindy Clesca & Lynne D. Richardson - 2021 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 12 (1):24-32.
Conducting industrial and organizational psychological research: Institutional review of research in work organizations.Daniel R. Ilgen & Bradford S. Bell - 2001 - Ethics and Behavior 11 (4):395 – 412.
Respect for Persons Is Not Always About Consent: The Importance of Context.Liza Dawson - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (4):115-118.
Analytics
Added to PP
2024-03-27
Downloads
103 (#206,361)
6 months
86 (#72,407)
2024-03-27
Downloads
103 (#206,361)
6 months
86 (#72,407)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Reframing Consent for Clinical Research: A Function-Based Approach.Scott Y. H. Kim, David Wendler, Kevin P. Weinfurt, Robert Silbergleit, Rebecca D. Pentz, Franklin G. Miller, Bernard Lo, Steven Joffe, Christine Grady, Sara F. Goldkind, Nir Eyal & Neal W. Dickert - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (12):3-11.
To Swab or Not to Swab: Waiver of Consent to Collect Perianal Specimens from Incapacitated Patients With Severe Burn Injury.Liza Dawson, Andrew D. Ray, Benjamin S. Wilfond & Liza-Marie Johnson - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (4):108-109.
When and Why Is Research without Consent Permissible?Luke Gelinas, Alan Wertheimer & Franklin G. Miller - 2016 - Hastings Center Report 46 (2):35-43.
Eliminating the daily life risks standard from the definition of minimal risk.D. B. Resnik - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (1):35-38.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-82spv uwo