Feminist Epistemology

Abstract

true (but not conversely); if someone is lucky in truly believing \x{D835}\x{DC5D}, their belief is not knowledge; if someone truly believes that \x{D835}\x{DC5D}, but cannot justify their belief with evidence, it is not knowledge; and so on

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Situating Feminist Epistemology.Louise M. Antony - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 8:31-40.
Toward a Feminist Epistemology.Jane Duran - 1991 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Feminist Epistemology.Helen E. Longino - 1999 - In John Greco & Ernest Sosa (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 325–353.
Gender and Feminist Epistemology.Nancy Daukas - 2016 - In Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen, Kimberley Brownlee & David Coady (eds.), A Companion to Applied Philosophy. Malden, MA: Wiley. pp. 61–75.
Feminist epistemology.Marianne Janack - 2004 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-06-13

Downloads
2,299 (#5,207)

6 months
87 (#70,871)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Antony Eagle
University of Adelaide

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Knowledge and practical interests.Jason Stanley - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The scientific image.C. Van Fraassen Bas - 1980 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Feminism in philosophy of science: Making sense of contingency and constraint.Alison Wylie - 2000 - In Miranda Fricker & Jennifer Hornsby (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 166--184.

Add more references