A Group-Based Approach to Reparations

Abstract

This paper attempts to offer a group-based approach to reparations for slavery. I argue that by appealing to a group-based approach to reparations, one can avoid some of the significant problems associated with attempting to justify reparations on an individual level. I argue that, properly formulated, a group-based approach can avoid problems of identification, the non-identity problem, as well as misgivings about appealing to the notion that groups can have a moral standing that is not merely the aggregation of the moral standing of the individual group members. In order to show that a group-based approach is a viable solution to these issues, I appeal to Larry May’s account of groups.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,253

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-05-01

Downloads
33 (#719,344)

6 months
4 (#864,415)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elizabeth Dwyer
Carleton University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Are there any Cultural Rights?Chandran Kukathas - 1992 - Political Theory 20 (1):105-139.
A Lockean argument for Black reparations.Bernard Boxill - 2003 - The Journal of Ethics 7 (1):63-91.
Collective responsibility.Jan Narveson - 2002 - The Journal of Ethics 6 (2):179-198.
Collective responsibility.Hannah Arendt - 1987 - In James William Bernauer, Amor mundi: explorations in the faith and thought of Hannah Arendt. Hingham, MA: distributors for the U.S. and Canada Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Who? Whom? Reparations and the problem of agency.Chandran Kukathas - 2006 - Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (3):330–341.

View all 8 references / Add more references