The asymmetry in Tobia's modal arguments

Abstract

In Tobia (2016), Kevin P. Tobia tests for bias using two ontological arguments claimed to be symmetrical and of equal strength. We show they are neither.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

Experimental Philosophy of Identity and the Self, by Kevin Tobia.Sebastian Meisel - 2023 - Teaching Philosophy 46 (2):267-270.
Gauging personal identity.Kevin Tobia - 2016 - Forum for European Philosophy Blog.
Modified Gaunilo-Type Objections Against Modal Ontological Arguments.Chlastawa Daniel - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4 (2):113--126.
Is Temporal Bias Key to Justifying Fischer's Asymmetry?Travis Timmerman - 2023 - In Taylor W. Cyr, Andrew Law & Neal A. Tognazzini (eds.), Freedom, Responsibility, and Value: Essays in Honor of John Martin Fischer. New York: Routledge. pp. 227-246.
Modal theistic arguments.Graham Oppy - 1993 - Sophia 32 (2):17-24.
Future Bias and Regret.Sayid Bnefsi - 2023 - In David Jakobsen, Peter Øhrstrøm & Per Hasle (eds.), Logic and Philosophy of Time: The History and Philosophy of Tense-Logic. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press. pp. 1-13.
Bi-Logic and Multi-Modal Argumentation: Understanding Emotional Arguments.Claudio Duran - unknown
Time – The Emotional Asymmetry.Caspar Hare - 2013 - In Adrian Bardon & Heather Dyke (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Time. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 507–520.
The effect of perspective-taking on reasoning about strong and weak belief-relevant arguments.Matthew T. McCrudden, Ashleigh Barnes, Erin M. McTigue, Casey Welch & Eilidh MacDonald - 2017 - Thinking and Reasoning 23 (2):115-133.
Commentary on Patrick Bondy, “Bias in Legitimate Ad Hominem Arguments”.Andrew Aberdein - 2016 - Argumentation, Objectivity and Bias: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 18–21, 2016.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-10-08

Downloads
652 (#40,143)

6 months
139 (#34,781)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Does religious belief impact philosophical analysis?Kevin P. Tobia - 2016 - Religion, Brain and Behavior 6 (1):56-66.

Add more references