What does the Appeal to Use Do for the Theory of Meaning?

In A. Margalit, Meaning and Use. Reidel. pp. 123--135 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

reprint Dummett, Michael (1993) "What Does the Appeal to Use Do for the Theory of Meaning?". In Dummett, Michael, The seas of language, pp. : Oxford University Press (1993)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,302

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The seas of language.Michael Dummett - 1993 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Use and Meaning.Richard Heck - 2007 - In R. E. Auxier & L. E. Hahn, The Philosophy of Michael Dummett. Open Court. pp. 531--57.
Dummett's Doubts and Frege's Concept of “Sense”.Hans Julius Schneider - 2014 - In Wittgenstein's Later Theory of Meaning: Imagination and Calculation. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 128–136.
More on 'The Philosophical Significance of Gödel's Theorem'.A. W. Moore - 1998 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 55 (1):103-126.
Michael Dummett and the Theory of Meaning.Darryl Gunson - 1998 - Ashgate Publishing.
Understanding Linguistic Meaning: Michael Dummett and the Theory of Meaning. [REVIEW]William Fish - 2000 - The Philosopher 88 (2).
Theory of Meaning: Sense, Force, Tone and Truth.Richard Dennis Kortum - 1994
Dummett on a theory of meaning and its impact on logic.Dag Prawitz - 1987 - In Barry Taylor, Michael Dummett: contributions to philosophy. Hingham, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 117–165.
La philosophie du langage de Wittgenstein selon Michael Dummett.Denis Sauvé - 1998 - Dialogue 37 (2):299-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-28

Downloads
52 (#437,458)

6 months
3 (#1,061,821)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Intuitionistic epistemic logic.Sergei Artemov & Tudor Protopopescu - 2016 - Review of Symbolic Logic 9 (2):266-298.
What assertion is not.Robert J. Stainton - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 85 (1):57-73.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references