- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Understanding Research Misconduct: A Comparative Analysis of 120 Cases of Professional Wrongdoing
James Dubois, Emily E. Anderson, John Chibnall, Kelly Carroll, Tyler Gibb, Chiji Ogbuka & Timothy Rubbelke
Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance 5 (20):320-338 (2013)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Taking Financial Relationships into Account When Assessing Research.David Resnik & Kevin Elliott - 2013 - Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance 20 (3):184-205.
Environmental Factors Contributing to Wrongdoing in Medicine: A Criterion-Based Review of Studies and Cases.James M. DuBois, Emily E. Anderson, Kelly Carroll, Tyler Gibb, Elena Kraus, Timothy Rubbelke & Meghan Vasher - 2012 - Ethics and Behavior 22 (3):163 - 188.
Ethics in Mental Health Research: Principles, Guidance, and Cases by James M. DuBois.Thomas K. Nelson - 2008 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 8 (3):581-584.
Research Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices.David B. Resnik - 2023 - In Erick Valdés & Juan Alberto Lecaros, Handbook of Bioethical Decisions. Volume II: Scientific Integrity and Institutional Ethics. Springer Verlag. pp. 2147483647-2147483647.
Ethics in Mental Health Research: Principles, Guidance, and Cases by James M. DuBois.M. D. Nelson - 2008 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 8 (3):581-584.
Seven ways to plagiarize: Handling real allegations of research misconduct.Michael C. Loui - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (4):529-539.
Research misconduct policy in biomedicine: beyond the bad-apple approach.Barbara Klug Redman - 2013 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Whistleblowing in Biomedical Research Policies and Procedures for Responding to Reports of Misconduct : Proceedings of a Workshop, September 21-22, 1981.inc United States, Medicine in the Public Interest & Aaas Committee on Scientific Freedom and Responsibility - 1981 - The Commission for Sale by the Supt. Of Docs., U.S. G.P.O.
The nurses’ perception of the factors influencing professional misconduct: A qualitative study.Akram Ghobadi, Leila Sayadi, Nahid Dehghan Nayeri, Alireza Namazi Shabestari & Shokoh Varaei - 2024 - Nursing Ethics 31 (2-3):281-295.
Scientific Integrity in Brazil.Liliane Lins & Fernando Martins Carvalho - 2014 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11 (3):283-287.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-02-13
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2020-02-13
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Publish or be ethical? Publishing pressure and scientific misconduct in research.Mariola Paruzel-Czachura, Lidia Baran & Zbigniew Spendel - 2021 - Research Ethics 17 (3):375-397.
A scoping review of the literature featuring research ethics and research integrity cases.Péter Kakuk, Soren Holm, János Kristóf Bodnár, Mohammad Hosseini, Jonathan Lewis, Bert Gordijn & Anna Catharina Vieira Armond - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-14.
Research Misconduct in the Fields of Ethics and Philosophy: Researchers’ Perceptions in Spain.Ramón A. Feenstra, Emilio Delgado López-Cózar & Daniel Pallarés-Domínguez - 2021 - Science and Engineering Ethics 27 (1):1-21.
Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 2) — a multi-actor qualitative study on problems of science.Wim Pinxten & Noémie Aubert Bonn - 2021 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 6 (1).
Research integrity: environment, experience, or ethos?Bjørn Hofmann & Søren Holm - 2019 - Research Ethics 15 (3-4):1-13.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-dwqgq uwo