Hume Was Right, Almost; and Where He Wasn't, Kant Was

Midwest Studies in Philosophy 9 (1):135-149 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hume and Contemporary Ethical Naturalism.S. D. Guttenplan - 1983 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 8 (1):309-320.
Autonomy in Rawls and Kant.Bernard H. Baumrin - 1976 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 1 (1):55-57.
The Concept of Natural Right.Ramon M. Lemos - 1982 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 7 (1):133-150.
Kant on Intuition.Arthur Melnick - 1983 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 8 (1):339-358.
Kant on Objectivity.T. E. Wilkerson - 1983 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 8 (1):373-386.
A Global Right of Water.Tim Hayward - 2016 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 40 (1):217-233.
Heteronomy and autonomy—rawls and Kant.Oliver A. Johnson - 1977 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 2 (1):277-279.
Can there be a right-based moral theory?J. L. Mackie - 1978 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 3 (1):350-359.
Hume and the Bauhaus Theory of Ethics.Geoffrey Sayre-McCord - 1995 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 20 (1):280-298.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
51 (#425,949)

6 months
9 (#475,977)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references