For a Negative, Normative Model of Consent, With a Comment on Preference-Skepticism

Legal Theory 2 (2):113-120 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Let me begin by admitting that I am wary of any comprehensive definition of consent. This bias stems from my professional concentration on criminal law, in which nouons of freedom and responsibility play vital roles in a wide range of contexts. In each context, however, one discovers that freedom means something different. A voluntary act is any bodily movement not caused by external force or nervous disorder. On the other hand, a voluntary act, however horrific its results, ordinarily may be punished only if the actor was subjectively aware that the act was wrong. In any event, a voluntary act may be excused as the product of duress if another person procures the actor's cooperation in the crime by an illegal threat that would overcome the resistance of a person of ordinary firmness

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
21 (#1,015,677)

6 months
10 (#430,153)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Personhood, Equality, and a Possible Justification for Criminal Punishment.Liat Levanon - 2014 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 27 (2):439-472.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references