Where to Look for Guidance? On the Nature of “Religion and Science”

Zygon 39 (2):367-378 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract.For moral guidance we human beings may be tempted to turn toward the past (scripture, tradition), toward present science, or toward future consequences. Each of these approaches has strengths and limitations. To address those limitations, we need to consider how these various perspectives can be brought together—and “religion and science” is an area in which this may happen. That makes the question of where to look for guidance potentially a central one for religion and science, setting the agenda differently from apologetic questions with respect to religion or to science. However, “religion and science” does not solve the issues, leading to a single normative perspective; the way that current knowledge is integrated with past wisdom is highly dependent upon ideals that relate to the future. Thus, rather than resolving the need for guidance, the religion‐and‐science conversation becomes one way of addressing our need for guidance, bringing into the conversation past, present, and future.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
221 (#116,633)

6 months
6 (#869,904)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Ethics.William K. Frankena - 1973 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,: Prentice-Hall.
Biophilia.Edward O. Wilson (ed.) - 2009 - Harvard University Press.
Ethics.William Frankena - 1967 - Philosophy of Science 34 (1):74-74.
The sacred depths of nature.Ursula Goodenough - 1998 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 11 references / Add more references