At Law: Defining Research Misconduct: Will We Know It When We See It?

Hastings Center Report 31 (3):31 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2012

DOI

10.2307/3527554

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Rebecca Dresser is Daniel Noyes.Denise M. Dudzinski & Sara Goering - forthcoming - Hastings Center Report.
Rebecca Dresser is Daniel Noyes.Nicole Deming - forthcoming - Hastings Center Report.
What Do We Know When We Know How to Go On?James Lindemann Nelson - 2001 - Hastings Center Report 31 (4):50-51.
To the Editor: Rebecca Dresser makes a strong appeal for additions to the current federal policy (known as the Common Rule) governing the involve-ment of adults with decisional impair.Henry Silverman - forthcoming - Hastings Center Report.
Legal Commentary Society.Gregory E. Kaebnick - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (1):2-2.
Nature's Last Word: Will We Know It?Bernard D. Davis & Gunther Stent - 1977 - Hastings Center Report 7 (3):4.
Law and the Life Sciences: Defining Death: There Ought to Be a Law.George J. Annas - 1983 - Hastings Center Report 13 (1):20.
When we dead awaken.Hl Nelson - 1992 - Hastings Center Report 22 (1):3-3.
How Much Do We Want to Know About the Unborn?Marc Lappe - 1973 - Hastings Center Report 3 (1):8-9.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
17 (#1,154,993)

6 months
6 (#869,904)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The legacy of the Hwang case: Research misconduct in biosciences.Péter Kakuk - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (4):545-562.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references