Reply to Chakrabarti: Some Comments on Contraposition in European and Indian Logic

International Philosophical Quarterly 32 (4):515-517 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00190365

DOI

10.5840/ipq199232438

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Contraposition in European and Indian Logic.Kisor K. Chakrabarti - 1989 - International Philosophical Quarterly 29 (2):121-127.
Theories of Language in Indian Logic.S. S. Barlingay - 1964 - International Philosophical Quarterly 4 (1):94-109.
Reply to Gordon: Formal and Dialectical Logic.Errol E. Harris - 1991 - International Philosophical Quarterly 31 (4):485-487.
Reason and Tradition in Indian Thought: An Essay on the Nature of Indian Philosophical Thinking. [REVIEW]Eliot Deutsch - 1994 - International Philosophical Quarterly 34 (2):262-264.
Reply.James F. Ross - 1962 - International Philosophical Quarterly 2 (4):658-662.
The Indian Renaissance.R. V. De Smet - 1968 - International Philosophical Quarterly 8 (1):5-37.
Reply to Marsh.Ronald H. Mckinney - 1991 - International Philosophical Quarterly 31 (3):349-351.
Reply to Heyd.Robert J. Roth - 1989 - International Philosophical Quarterly 29 (4):469-472.
Reply to Mercier.M. M. Agrawal - 1989 - International Philosophical Quarterly 29 (3):351-356.
The Naturalistic Tradition in Indian Thought.W. N. C. - 1961 - International Philosophical Quarterly 1 (3):538-539.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
31 (#727,171)

6 months
11 (#343,210)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references