I ain’t afraid of no ghost

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 88 (C):70-84 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper criticizes the traditional philosophical account of the quantization of gauge theories and offers an alternative. On the received view, gauge theories resist quantization because they feature distinct mathematical representatives of the same physical state of affairs. This resistance is overcome by a sequence of ad hoc modifications, justified in part by reference to semiclassical electrodynamics. Among other things, these modifications introduce "ghosts": particles with unphysical properties which do not appear in asymptotic states and which are said to be purely a notational convenience. I argue that this sequence of modifications is unjustified and inadequate, making it a poor basis for the interpretation of ghosts. I then argue that gauge theories can be quantized by the same method as any other theory. On this account, ghosts are not purely notation: they are coordinates on the classical configuration space of the theory—specifically, on its gauge structure. This interpretation does not fall prey to the standard philosophical arguments against the significance of ghosts, due to Weingard. Weingard’s argumentative strategy, properly applied, in fact tells in favor of ghosts’ physical significance.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A partial elucidation of the gauge principle.Alexandre Guay - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39 (2):346-363.
Large gauge transformations and the strong CP problem.John Dougherty - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 69:50-66.
Relativistic Quantum Mechanics and Field Theory.F. Strocchi - 2004 - Foundations of Physics 34 (3):501-527.
Gauge symmetry and the Theta vacuum.Richard Healey - 2009 - In Mauricio Suárez, Mauro Dorato & Miklós Rédei (eds.), EPSA Philosophical Issues in the Sciences: Launch of the European Philosophy of Science Association. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer. pp. 105--116.
Understanding Gauge.James Owen Weatherall - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 83 (5):1039-1049.
Wait, why gauge?Sébastien Rivat - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
An Alternative to the Gauge Theoretic Setting.Bert Schroer - 2011 - Foundations of Physics 41 (10):1543-1568.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-05-29

Downloads
64 (#334,020)

6 months
12 (#311,239)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Dougherty
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

Citations of this work

Wait, why gauge?Sébastien Rivat - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Effective and Selective Realisms.John Dougherty - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

Add more citations

References found in this work

String Theory and the Scientific Method.Richard Dawid - 2013 - Cambridge University Press.
Sophistication about Symmetries.Neil Dewar - 2019 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 70 (2):485-521.
The hole truth.Jeremy Butterfield - 1989 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (1):1-28.
Holism and structuralism in U(1) gauge theory.Holger Lyre - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (4):643-670.

View all 35 references / Add more references