Four points about drug decriminalization

Criminal Justice Ethics 22 (1):21-29 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review of Ignorance Of Law: A Philosophical Inquiry, by Douglas Husak. [REVIEW]Stephen Bero - 2017 - Criminal Law and Criminal Justice Books 2017 (March).
The Architecture of Criminalization.Victor Tadros - 2009 - Criminal Justice Ethics 28 (1):74-88.
The Legalization of Drugs.Doug Husak & Peter de Marneffe - 2005 - Cambridge University Press.
Review essay/taking drugs and rights seriously.Gerald F. Gaus - 1995 - Criminal Justice Ethics 14 (1):63-72.
Paternalism On Pain of Punishment.Heidi M. Hurd - 2009 - Criminal Justice Ethics 28 (1):49-73.
Reply to Murphy and Husak.Michael Gorr - 1991 - Criminal Justice Ethics 10 (1):24-26.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
285 (#95,186)

6 months
13 (#253,178)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Douglas Husak
Rutgers - New Brunswick

Citations of this work

Drug War Reparations.Jessica Flanigan & Christopher Freiman - 2020 - Res Philosophica 97 (2):141-168.
On the decriminalization of drugs.George Sher - 2003 - Criminal Justice Ethics 22 (1):30-33.
Epilogue: What good are drugs anyway?Lester H. Hunt - 2003 - Criminal Justice Ethics 22 (1):46-49.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Limitations on Criminalization and the General Part of Criminal Law,”.Douglas N. Husak - 2002 - In Stephen Shute & Andrew Simester (eds.), Criminal law theory: doctrines of the general part. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 13--46.
[Book review] drugs and rights. [REVIEW]Douglas N. Husak - 1995 - Criminal Justice Ethics 14 (1):63-72.

Add more references