Fickle consent

Philosophical Studies 167 (1):25-40 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Why is consent revocable? In other words, why must we respect someone's present dissent at the expense of her past consent? This essay argues against act-based explanations and in favor of a rule-based explanation. A rule prioritizing present consent will serve our interests the best, in light of our interests in having flexibility over our consent and in minimizing the possibility of error in people's judgments about whether we consent

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-14

Downloads
878 (#25,749)

6 months
91 (#68,650)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tom Dougherty
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Citations of this work

Permissive consent: a robust reason-changing account.Neil Manson - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 173 (12):3317-3334.
Ethical Puzzles of Time Travel.Sara Bernstein - 2012 - In Andrei Marmor (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Law. New York , NY: Routledge.
Consent as an act of commitment.Robert E. Goodin - 2024 - European Journal of Philosophy 32 (1):194-209.
An “ethics of strangers”? On knowing the patient in clinical ethics.Joar Björk & Anna Hirsch - 2024 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 27 (3):389-397.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon (ed.) - 1998 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
A Theory of Justice.John Rawls - 1971 - Oxford,: Harvard University Press. Edited by Steven M. Cahn.
A treatise of human nature.David Hume & D. G. C. Macnabb (eds.) - 1739 - Oxford,: Clarendon press.

View all 18 references / Add more references