Why Are (Most) Laws of Nature Mathematical?

In Jan Faye, Paul Needham, Uwe Scheffler & Max Urchs (eds.), Nature's Principles. Springer. pp. 55--75 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Laws of nature versus system laws.Gerhard Schurz - 2005 - In Jan Faye, Paul Needham, Uwe Scheffler & Max Urchs (eds.), Nature's Principles. Springer. pp. 255--268.
The Nature of Natural Laws.Lars-Göran Johansson - 2005 - In Jan Faye, Paul Needham, Uwe Scheffler & Max Urchs (eds.), Nature's Principles. Springer. pp. 151--166.
Laws of Nature—A Skeptical View.Uwe Meixner - 2005 - In Jan Faye, Paul Needham, Uwe Scheffler & Max Urchs (eds.), Nature's Principles. Springer. pp. 229--238.
Reply to Mauro Dorato.Hilary Putnam - 2008 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 4 (2):71-73.
How nature makes sense.Jan Faye - 2005 - In Jan Faye, Paul Needham, Uwe Scheffler & Max Urchs (eds.), Nature's Principles. Springer. pp. 77--102.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-28

Downloads
133 (#166,004)

6 months
5 (#1,039,842)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mauro Dorato
Università degli Studi Roma Tre

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references