The just war index: Comparing warfighting and counterinsurgency in afghanistan

Journal of Military Ethics 10 (3):242-262 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract Is the use of armed force by international forces in Afghanistan ethically justified? The answer is one of degree: the fighting is neither completely just nor completely unjust. To evaluate the extent of justification, a novel Just War Index (JWI) is introduced. It is a composite indicator: the average of estimated values for seven criteria from the long-standing Just War tradition ? Just Cause, Right Intent, Net benefit, Legitimate Authority, Last Resort, Proportionality of Means and Right Conduct, each of which are evaluated on a 7-point scale. Because the two international missions using armed force in Afghanistan ? the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) ? have different mandates, different histories and different approaches to the use of force, they are evaluated separately. The ISAF mission is found considerably more justified than OEF though still ethically deficient

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-09-25

Downloads
72 (#302,539)

6 months
12 (#218,371)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A Typology of War Ethics.Davis Brown - 2017 - Journal of Military Ethics 16 (3-4):145-156.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Just and Unjust Wars.M. Walzer - 1979 - Philosophy 54 (209):415-420.

Add more references