The Affective and Practical Consequences of Presentism and Eternalism

Argumenta (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the dispute between presentism and eternalism, the affective dimensions of the debate have been somewhat neglected. Contemporary philosophers of time have not tried to relate these ontological positions with two of the most discussed maxims in the history of ethics – “live in the present” vs. “look at your life under the aspect of the eternity” (sub specie aeternitatis)– that since the Hellenistic times have been regarded as strictly connected with them. Consequently, I raise the question of whether the endorsement of one of these two ontological views can make a practical difference in the way we should live.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-06-18

Downloads
610 (#47,671)

6 months
148 (#33,677)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mauro Dorato
Università degli Studi Roma Tre

Citations of this work

Awareness without Time.Akiko Frischhut - forthcoming - Philosophical Quarterly.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What Makes Time Special?Craig Callender - 2017 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Philosophy as a way of life: spiritual exercises from Socrates to Foucault.Pierre Hadot - 1995 - Malden, MA: Blackwell. Edited by Arnold I. Davidson.
Mysticism and logic.Bertrand Russell - 1918 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications.
How Physics Makes Us Free.Jenann Ismael - 2016 - , US: Oxford University Press USA.

View all 25 references / Add more references