Furcht und Angst

Il Cannocchiale. Rivista di Studi Filosofici (3):53-72 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Is fear a ‘deficient mode’ of anxiety? This claim made by Martin Heidegger in ‘Being and Time’ (1927) depends on an analysis of intentionality. Emotions take objects: to love, to hate, to fear is to love, to hate, to fear someone or something. Yet anxiety, Heidegger maintains (‘Being and Time’ § 40), is about “nothing” (“nichts”) rather than “something” (“etwas”). Heidegger then turns lack of knowledge or understanding of what one’s anxiety is about into a revelation of “Nothing” (“Die Angst offenbart das Nichts”; ‘Being and Time’ § 40) – a state meant to manifest freedom. Yet freedom is not increased but diminished if and when someone cannot judge the direction, extent and power of a threat. Concrete, determinate thought liberates; someone is less free in anxiety than in fear.

Other Versions

reprint Dorschel, Andreas (2012) "Furcht und Angst". In Goltschnigg, Dietmar, Angst. Lähmender Stillstand und Motor des Fortschritts, pp. 49-54: Stauffenburg (2012)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-12-17

Downloads
1 (#1,946,081)

6 months
1 (#1,890,334)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andreas Dorschel
Goethe University Frankfurt

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references