The trees of constitution

Philosophical Studies 49 (3):385 - 392 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The general account of material constitution presented in my article, Spatially Coinciding Objects (Ratio vol. 24.1, June 1982), is further developed. There we saw how distinct objects in the same place at the same time can be strictly ordered by an asymmetrical, transitive relation of material constitution. I show herein how this relation can conceivably form ‘upright trees’ in which one object constitutes two other objects, neither of which constitutes the other. It is, however, impossible to have ‘inverted trees’ in which one thing is constituted by two things neither of which constitutes the other. (This impossibility is implied when supposing that there is just one thing which counts as the proximate matter of a thing.)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,601

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
49 (#479,346)

6 months
10 (#326,027)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frederick Charles Doepke
University of California, Berkeley (PhD)

Citations of this work

Ordinary objects.Daniel Z. Korman & Jonathan Barker - 2025 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Coincidence as parthood.Jean-Baptiste Guillon - 2019 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 18):4247-4276.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Quantities.Helen Morris Cartwright - 1970 - Philosophical Review 79 (1):25-42.
Re-identifying matter.Denis Robinson - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (3):317-341.

Add more references