Taste, traits, and tendencies

Philosophical Studies 178 (4):1183-1206 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many experiential properties are naturally understood as dispositions such that e.g. a cake tastes good to you iff you are disposed to get gustatory pleasure when you eat it. Such dispositional analyses, however, face a challenge. It has been widely observed that one cannot properly assert “The cake tastes good to me” unless one has tried it. This acquaintance requirement is puzzling on the dispositional account because it should be possible to be disposed to like the cake even if this disposition has never been manifested. We argue that familiar response strategies on behalf of the dispositionalist fail. These include appeals to conversational implicatures, expressivism, semantic presuppositions and norms of assertion. Against this background, we propose a new analysis in terms of what we call tendencies, where a tendency is a disposition that has been manifested. The acquaintance requirement comes out as an entailment. We point out a hitherto unnoticed parallel to sentences ascribing character traits such as “Hannah is brave,” and extend our tendency-based analysis to this domain.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Projection Problem for Predicates of Taste.Dilip Ninan - 2020 - Semantics and Linguistic Theory 30:753-778.
Fake Dispositional Sentences: Manley and Wasserman's Misstep.Sungho Choi - 2021 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 103 (4):859-873.
An Expressivist Theory of Taste Predicates.Dilip Ninan - 2024 - Philosophers' Imprint 24 (1).
The acquaintance inference with 'seem'-reports.Rachel Etta Rudolph - 2019 - Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society 54:451-460.
Minkish dispositions.Alan Hájek - 2020 - Synthese 197 (11):4795-4811.
Phenomenal dispositions.Henry Ian Schiller - 2020 - Synthese 197 (9):3969-3980.
What Tends to Be: The Philosophy of Dispositional Modality.Lill Anjum Rani & Mumford Stephen - 2018 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Stephen Mumford.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-16

Downloads
212 (#123,142)

6 months
15 (#168,777)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Alexander Dinges
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Julia Zakkou
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf

References found in this work

Knowledge and its limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Studies in the way of words.Herbert Paul Grice - 1989 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Relativism and Monadic Truth.Herman Cappelen & John Hawthorne - 2009 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. Edited by John Hawthorne.
Potentiality: From Dispositions to Modality.Barbara Vetter - 2013 - Oxford, England and New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.

View all 41 references / Add more references