Translation, reliability, and validity of the Chinese version of the Moral Identity Scale in a sample of male offenders

Ethics and Behavior (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Moral identity is crucial in offenders’ moral rehabilitation, yet no validated measure exists for Chinese male offenders. The present study translated the Moral Identity Scale (MIS) and examined its construct validity and reliability in Chinese male offenders (n = 542). A confirmatory factor analysis showed an acceptable fit for the data. The convergent validity was demonstrated by its significant positive correlations with the Moral-self subscale of the Moral Identity Questionnaire. Furthermore, MIS displayed negative correlations with Amorality and Moral Disengagement, and positive correlations with Moral Attitude, Empathic Concern, and Moral Responsibility, indicating a good nomological validity. Regarding discriminant validity, the revised MIS exhibited nonsignificant or weak correlations with Social Desirability and Retributive Justice Expectations, while the two subscales exhibited distinct correlations with Imagination with Sympathy and Perceived Social Injustice. The test-retest reliability over 4 weeks was.68 (n=113). These findings underscore the reliability and validity of the revised MIS.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Belief in Jinn Possession Scale: Development and validation.Nida Falak Naz & Naeem Aslam - 2024 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 46 (1):88-105.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-07-09

Downloads
10 (#1,467,566)

6 months
7 (#699,353)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Psychopaths and Moral Identity.Gwen Adshead - 2013 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 20 (4):339-343.

Add more references