Public Opinion on Cognitive Enhancement Varies across Different Situations

, &
American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (4):224-237 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/21507740.2020.1811797

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

How Public Opinion Can Inform Cognitive Enhancement Regulation.Iris Coates McCall, Tristan McIntosh & Veljko Dubljević - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (4):245-247.
Cognitive Enhancement and Autonomous Vehicles: What Differences in Social and Individual Endorsement Imply.Joseph Vukov, Rohan Meda & Sarah Khan - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (4):243-245.
Cognitive Enhancement: Toward a Rational Public Consensus.Eman Ahmed & Kristien Hens - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (4):263-265.
Does brain injury impair speech and gesture differently?Ciencia Cognitiva - forthcoming - Ciencia Cognitiva.
¿Afecta el daño cerebral al habla y los gestos de forma independiente?Ciencia Cognitiva - forthcoming - Ciencia Cognitiva.
Just how cognitive is emotion? The continuing importance of the philosophy of emotion in enhancement ethics.Rebecca Bamford - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics-Neuroscience 4 (1):18-19.
Conceptual Definitions and Meaningful Generalizability in Cognitive Enhancement.Christian Carrozzo - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (4):261-263.
Virtues-Based Policies for Pharmacological Cognitive Enhancement.Gavin Enck - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (4):266-268.
Cognitive Enhancement with Amphetamine: History Repeats Itself.Irena Ilieva & Martha J. Farah - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 4 (1):24-25.
Cognitive Enhancement and Metaphor Choice as Moral Choice.Paul Tubig & Sierra Simmerman - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (1):50-51.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-17

Downloads
41 (#545,769)

6 months
4 (#1,247,093)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Service and Status Competition May Help Explain Perceived Ethical Acceptability.Hugh Desmond - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (4):258-260.
When People of Color Are Left out of Research, Science and the Public Loses.Keisha Shantel Ray - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (4):238-240.

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Cognitive enhancement, cheating, and accomplishment.Rob Goodman - 2010 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (2):pp. 145-160.
Prozac, Enhancement, and Self‐Creation.David Degrazia - 2000 - Hastings Center Report 30 (2):34-40.
The promise and predicament of cosmetic neurology.Anjan Chatterjee - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (2):110-113.

View all 21 references / Add more references