Kant, Mothersill and principles of taste

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 47 (4):375-376 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hume's principles of taste: A reply to Dickie.James Shelley - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):84-89.
Kant and the Claims of Taste.Eva Schaper - 1979 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 38 (2):198-200.
Mary Mothersill' S Beauty Restored.Paul Guyer - 1986 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 44 (3):245-255.
Kant and the subjective objects of taste.Berel Lang - 1967 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 25 (3):247-253.
Kant, Beauty, and The Object of Taste.Stuart Jay Petock - 1969 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 28 (2):183-186.
"The Art Circle": A Theory of Art": George Dickie. [REVIEW]Graham Mcfee - 1986 - British Journal of Aesthetics 26 (1):72.
Dickie on artifactuality.Thomas C. Ryckman - 1989 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 47 (2):175-177.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
94 (#227,629)

6 months
12 (#289,827)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references