”Ostrich Nominalism’ or ”Mirage Realism’?

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 61 (4):433-439 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In "nominalism and realism" armstrong carefully demolishes various nominalist responses to plato's "one over many" problem but simply dismissed the quinean response as "ostrich nominalism". The paper argues that plato's problem is pseudo. So to ignore it is not to behave like an ostrich. Rather to adopt realism because of this problem that isn't there is to be a "mirage realist." there are some good reasons that lead armstrong to realism but he is largely a mirage realist. Quine does not ignore any real problem for nominalism and so is not an ostrich nominalist.

Other Versions

reprint Devitt, Michael (1997) "Ostrich Nominalism or Mirage Realism?". In Mellor, David Hugh, Oliver, Alex, Properties, pp. : Oxford University Press (1997)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-28

Downloads
868 (#28,135)

6 months
43 (#107,387)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Devitt
CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

Properties.Francesco Orilia & Michele Paolini Paoletti - 2020 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Nominalist Realism.Nicholas K. Jones - 2017 - Noûs 52 (4):808-835.
Against Ostrich Nominalism: a Reply to Michael Devitt.David Armstrong - 1980 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 61 (4):440-449.

View all 76 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references