- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A reply to Levick's' were it physically safe, reproductive human cloning would not be acceptable'
In Arthur L. Caplan & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary debates in bioethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 98--100 (2013)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Reply to Levick's ‘Were it physically safe, reproductive human cloning would not be acceptable.Katrien Devolder - 2013 - In Arthur L. Caplan & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary debates in bioethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 98-101.
Were it physically safe, reproductive human cloning would be acceptable.Katrien Devolder - 2013 - In Arthur L. Caplan & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary debates in bioethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 79--88.
Were It Physically Safe, Human Reproductive Cloning Would.Be Acceptable - 2013 - In Arthur L. Caplan & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary debates in bioethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 25--79.
Reply to Devolder.On Reasoning Analogy - 2013 - In Arthur L. Caplan & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary debates in bioethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 101.
Contemporary debates in bioethics.Arthur L. Caplan & Robert Arp (eds.) - 2013 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Katrien Devolder: The ethics of embryonic stem cell research: Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015, 176 pp, £30.00. [REVIEW]Ronald M. Green - 2015 - Monash Bioethics Review 33 (2-3):226-228.
Response to "May a Woman Clone Herself" by Jean Chambers.Timothy F. Murphy - 2002 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (1):83-86.
Safety, identity and consent: A limited defense of reproductive human cloning.Robert Lane - 2006 - Bioethics 20 (3):125–135.
Human Cloning: Category, Dignity, and the Role of Bioethics.Evelyne Shuster - 2003 - Bioethics 17 (5-6):517-525.
Katrien Devolder: The Ethics of Embryonic Stem Cell Research.Marco Stier - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (2):545-546.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-26
Downloads
43 (#521,582)
6 months
5 (#1,053,842)
2014-01-26
Downloads
43 (#521,582)
6 months
5 (#1,053,842)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-ls7fw uwo