(2) there is evil in the world

Abstract

Plantinga construes the “atheologian” as claiming that “the conjunction of these two propositions is necessarily false, false in every possible world,” while Plantinga “aims to show that there is a possible world in which (1) and (2) are both true.”.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,880

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Plantinga and the Problem of Evil.Heimir Geirsson - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:109-113.
A Critique of Schellenberg’s New Logical Argument from Evil.Mahboobeh Pakdel & Amirabbas Alizamani - 2023 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 25 (2):33-56.
Warrant and analysis.Joel Pust - 2000 - Analysis 60 (1):51–57.
Cosmoi: The Best of All Possible Worlds.Donald Albert Turner - 1994 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
Non-Moral Evil and the Free Will Defense.Kenneth Boyce - 2011 - Faith and Philosophy 28 (4):371-384.
Plantinga's Necessary A Posteriori Truths.Gregory W. Fitch - 1978 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 8 (2):323-327.
What God Could Have Made.Michael Losonsky & Heimir Geirsson - 2005 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 43 (3):355-376.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
44 (#513,926)

6 months
44 (#105,566)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Keith DeRose
Yale University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references