Flying Too Close to the Sun: Lessons Learned from the Judicial Expansion of the Objective Patient Standard for Informed Consent in Wisconsin

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 45 (1):51-59 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Wisconsin Supreme Court, after adopting the doctrine of the objective patient standard, expanded it in bold and innovative ways over nearly four decades, until the Wisconsin legislative and executive branches drastically reversed this course. The saga has implications for other jurisdictions considering adoption or expansion of the objective patient standard doctrine.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Informed Consent and Patient Autonomy.Robert Young - 1998 - In Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer (eds.), A Companion to Bioethics. Malden, Mass., USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 530–540.
In re Edna MF: Case law confusion in surrogate decision making.Robyn S. Shapiro - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (1):45-54.
Free Choice and Patient Best Interests.Emma C. Bullock - 2016 - Health Care Analysis 24 (4):374-392.
Illinois Court Holds Physicians Liable Under Learned Intermediary Doctrine.T. B. E. - 1996 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (1):73-74.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-07-21

Downloads
28 (#797,889)

6 months
4 (#1,246,940)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references