Abstract

Present an opportunity for Kant's aesthetics in the first two key words "interest" and "existential" misreading stems from the critical philosophy from Kant. In Kant's philosophy, with interest and pleasure are the reasons for behavior associated with, any activities are necessary to practice the object of desire into a visual experience of the object, and vice versa, without any interest in the aesthetic pleasure feeling and behavior is no reason to associate this pleasure of the imagination is able to produce objects out of the "existence" has created a universal, coordinated with the intellectual's function "form." The present misinterpretations of the two key words 'interest' and 'existence' in the first moment of Kant's aesthetic originated from the departure from Kant's whole critical philosophy system. In Kant's philosophy, the pleasures with interest are all related to the reason of action, each practical activity aims to change the object of desire into an experiential object of intuition. On the contrary, the aesthetical pleasures without any interest haven't any relationship with the reason of action, this kind of pleasure will come into being only if tile imagination can create certain universal 'form' which transcends 'the existence' of object and harmonizes with the faculty of understanding.