- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Best Interests Standard as a Logic of Empire: Unpacking the Political Dimensions of Parental Refusal
American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):83-85 (2018)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
DCDD and Children: A Defense of the “Best Interests” Standard.Pablo De Lora - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (8):21-22.
Parental refusals of medical treatment: The harm principle as threshold for state intervention.Douglas Diekema - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4):243-264.
An Accessibility Constraint on Parental Refusal of Critical Newborn Screening.Michael J. Deem - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (1):24-26.
Parental Refusal of Newborn Screening for Congenital Hearing Loss.Danton Char - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (1):33-35.
The Harm Principle and the Best Interests Standard: Are Aspirational or Minimal Standards the Key?Giles Birchley - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):32-34.
A sufficiency threshold is not a harm principle: A better alternative to best interests for overriding parental decisions.Ben Saunders - 2020 - Bioethics 35 (1):90-97.
Deciding for a child: a comprehensive analysis of the best interest standard. [REVIEW]Erica K. Salter - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (3):179-198.
Should Parental Refusal of Puberty-Blocking Treatment be Overridden? The Role of the Harm Principle.Lauren Notini, Rosalind McDougall & Ken C. Pang - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):69-72.
Best Interests or Harm to Reverse Parental Decisions: Each in Its Own Domain.Allan J. Jacobs - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):41-44.
Neonatal Decision-Making: Beyond the Standard of Best Interests.Robert D. Truog & Sadath A. Sayeed - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (2):44 - 45.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-08-24
Downloads
33 (#689,169)
6 months
10 (#418,198)
2018-08-24
Downloads
33 (#689,169)
6 months
10 (#418,198)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Do Reasons Matter? Navigating Parents’ Reasons in Healthcare Decisions for Children.Bryanna Moore & Amy Caruso Brown - forthcoming - American Journal of Bioethics:1-16.
Bioethics as Object of Study: Dilemmas of Immanence in Research Ethics Review.Carey DeMichelis - 2021 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 12 (2):137-143.
References found in this work
Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Tom L. Beauchamp & James F. Childress - 1995 - Hastings Center Report 25 (4):37.
When Parents Refuse: Resolving Entrenched Disagreements Between Parents and Clinicians in Situations of Uncertainty and Complexity.Janine Penfield Winters - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):20-31.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-f5f4x uwo