Can ethical reasoning contribute to better epidemiology? A case study in research on racial health disparities

&
European Journal of Epidemiology 22 (4):215-21 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,830

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Inmaculada de Melo-Martín and Kristen Intemann. The Fight against Doubt: How to Bridge the Gap between Scientists and the Public.John Dupré - 2020 - Philosophy of Science 87 (1):204-207.
Inductive Risk and Regulatory Toxicology: A Comment on de Melo-Martín and Intemann.Daniel J. Hicks - 2018 - Philosophy of Science 85 (1):164-174.
Inmaculada de Melo-Martín, Kristen Intemann. 2018. The Fight Against Doubt: How to Bridge the Gap Between Scientists and the Public. [REVIEW]Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2020 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 35 (1):131-132.
Inmaculada de Melo-Martín and Kristen Intemann: The Fight Against Doubt—How to Bridge the Gap Between Scientists and the Public: Oxford University Press, Oxford 2018, 232 pp, £25.99, ISBN: 9780190869229. [REVIEW]Tobias Schönwitz, David Hopf & Daria Jadreškić - 2020 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 51 (1):203-206.
Review of Inmaculada de Melo-Martín and Kristen Intemann's The Fight Against Doubt. [REVIEW]John Dupre - forthcoming - Philosophy of Science.
Justice, stigma, and the new epidemiology of health disparities.Andrew M. Courtwright - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (2):90-96.
Normative Theory and the COVID Pandemic: Author’s Response to Miriam Solomon and Inmaculada de Melo-Martín.Maya J. Goldenberg - 2022 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 15 (2):116-130.
Rethinking Reprogenetics by Inmaculada de Melo-Martin. [REVIEW]Zahra Meghani - 2019 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 29 (1):1-5.
A pluralistic and socially responsible philosophy of epidemiology field should actively engage with social determinants of health and health disparities.Sean A. Valles - 2019 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 10):2589-2611.
Inmaculada de Melo-Martín: Rethinking reprogenetics: enhancing ethical analyses of reprogenetic technologies. Oxford University Press, New York, 2017, 288 pp, ISBN 9780190460204. [REVIEW]Natalia Fernández-Jimeno - 2018 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 39 (1):85-90.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-30

Downloads
2 (#1,892,323)

6 months
2 (#1,685,894)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Kristen Intemann
Inmaculada de Melo-Martin
Weill Cornell Medicine--Cornell University

Citations of this work

A problematic principle.Lyle Crawford, Daisy Laforce & Zubin Master - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (12):40 – 42.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references