- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A philosopher's reply to questions concerning Peirce's theory of signs
Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 62:169-178 (1998)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Coherence: Reply to Gerard Vreeswijk.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 84 (1):404-406.
Questions and Theses Concerning (Mental) Events and Causation.Pirmin Stekeler-Weithofer - 2000 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 76:195-218.
Kepler, Newton, Einstein and the string theory: Reply to David Atkinson.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 84 (1):103-105.
What is the best empirically equivalent theory?: Reply to Igor Douven.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):310-313.
Qualitative and quantitative inference to the best theory: Reply to Ilkka Niiniluoto.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):276-280.
Peirce's Semiotics as Complex Inquiry: Conflicting Methods.Roberta Kevelson - 1998 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 62:195-208.
Reply to critics.Ernest Gellner - 1996 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 48:623-686.
Confirmation and truthlikeness: Reply to Gerhard Schurz.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):160-166.
Overdetermination and reference: Reply to Emma Ruttkamp.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 84 (1):437-439.
Comparing properties and profiles: Reply to Maarten Franssen.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 84 (1):154-156.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-03-27
Downloads
11 (#1,419,405)
6 months
2 (#1,685,650)
2014-03-27
Downloads
11 (#1,419,405)
6 months
2 (#1,685,650)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-fcc9b7db9-lnxxs uwo