Single Payer meets managed competition: The case for public funding and private delivery

Hastings Center Report 38 (1):23-33 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Common sense and empirical evidence suggest that single-payer health insurance, combined with competitive private delivery, would be the most cost-effective way of achieving the major, widely accepted goals of health care reform. Among the current presidential candidates, Kucinich and Gravel have the most promising reform proposals, with Edwards’s and Obama’s as fall-backs.

Other Versions

edition DeGrazia, David (2012) "Single Payer Meets Managed Competition". Hastings Center Report 38(1):23-33

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A path to universal access.Paul T. Menzel - 2008 - Hastings Center Report 38 (1):34-36.
Saved from Themselves.Paul T. Menzel - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 42 (5):18-20.
Justice as a frame for health reform.Mary Crowley - 2008 - Hastings Center Report 38 (1):3-3.
Healthcare Reform 2.0.Stephanie Woolhandler & David Himmelstein - 2011 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 78 (4):719-730.
Index.[author unknown] - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 38 (6):48-51.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
99 (#214,821)

6 months
8 (#613,944)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David DeGrazia
George Washington University

Citations of this work

Beneficence, Justice, and Health Care.J. Paul Kelleher - 2014 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 24 (1):27-49.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references