The Aesthetic Creation Theory of Art

Sztuka I Filozofia (Art and Philosophy) 35:20-24 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a critical discussion of Nick Zangwill’s Aesthetic Creation Theory of Art, as presented in his book Aesthetic Creation. The discussion focuses on two questions: first, whether the notion of art implied by Zangwill’s theory is at once too wide and too narrow; second, whether Zangwill is right about the persistence conditions of works of art.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Must Aesthetic Definitions of Art be Disjunctive?Jonathan Farrell - 2008 - American Society for Aesthetics Graduate E-Journal 1 (1):1-6.
Aesthetic creation.Nick Zangwill - 2007 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Art, Self and Knowledge.Keith Lehrer - 2011 - , US: Oxford University Press.
A note on Nick Zangwill's `against the sociology of art'.Bridget Fowler - 2003 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (3):363-374.
An Aesthetics of Chinese Calligraphy.Xiongbo Shi - 2023 - Philosophy Compass 18 (5):e12912.
Formalism and the Consumable Arts.David E. W. Fenner - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Research 33:127-141.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-08-12

Downloads
1,097 (#17,977)

6 months
128 (#41,092)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rafael De Clercq
Lingnan University

Citations of this work

The Aesthetic Engagement Theory of Art.Patrick Grafton-Cardwell - 2021 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 8:243-268.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references