Abstract

When reading a text in the Western tradition of philosophy, Kant, Hegel, et al, one notices that - much of consists of exploration of notions, ideas or concepts. This is the what of philosophy - conceptuaL exploration in terms of speculations, attitudes and opinions. Something else that strikes one is that the author reifies these notions and deal with them as if they are things. One finds the above in all disciplines, not just those that are passed off a ‘philosophy’. These explorations are usually executed by means of tools that include reasoning and argumentation. Nothing in particular makes some of them philosophical or more philosophical than other. Their supposedly philosophical nature and relevance occurs when this notion is projected on them when they are viewed as metaphysical, ontological, ethics, epistemological or another philosophical term, branch or domain. I deal with intersubjectivity and more specifically philosophy's intersubjectivity. As well as the aims, methods and objectives of this institution and tradition. All disciplines and arts employ this specualtion, usualy in the context of defining terms. The why is because with increased differentiation of sciences, humanities and arts, there is nothing remaining for philosophy to do. The how is the the tools, methods and techniques of philosophy.