Dehumanization or the Disappearance of Pluralism?

Diogenes 49 (195):34-37 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The ‘dehuman’ and the inhuman are not, even partially, exterior to the human, as are the material and the living, the animal and the bestial; they represent rather the extremes, the very limits of the human. The inhuman forms the interior facet of the boundary which makes us human and concerns us as such. In that sense, it is never exterior to us.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Human Animal.Adriel Trott - 2012 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):269-285.
The Goodness and Evil of Objects and Ends.Thomas M. Osborne Jr - 2015 - In M. V. Dougherty (ed.), Aquinas's Disputed Questions on Evil: A Critical Guide. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. pp. 126-45.
Godfrey of Fontaines on the Moral Imputability of Exterior Acts.Michael Szlachta - 2020 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 37 (4):331-349.
Worlds without people: the "inhuman" in contemporary philosophy and art.Ondřej Váša (ed.) - 2023 - Prague: Filosofia, Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences.
Inhuman and Degrading Treatment: The Words Themselves.Jeremy Waldron - 2010 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 23 (2):269-286.
Evolution and Human Cognition.Ian Tattersall - 2019 - Aisthesis. Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 12 (2):11-18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
110 (#194,255)

6 months
10 (#410,099)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references