Cartesian analyticity

Southern Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):47-55 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The syllogism and the predicate calculus cannot account for an ontological argument in Descartes' Fifth Meditation and related texts. Descartes' notion of god relies on the analytic-synthetic distinction, which Descartes had identified before Leibniz and Kant did. I describe how the syllogism and the predicate calculus cannot explain Descartes' ontological argument; then I apply the analytic-synthetic distinction to Descartes’ idea of god.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Descartes’ Ontological Argument in Meditation V.Daniel E. Flage - 2022 - The European Legacy 27 (3-4):335-347.
The importance of cartesian triangles: A new look at Descartes's ontological argument.M. V. Dougherty - 2002 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (1):35 – 62.
Descartes's Method.Murray Miles - 2007 - In Janet Broughton & John Carriero, A Companion to Descartes. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 145–163.
Descartes and the 'Meditations'. [REVIEW]Roland Breeur - 2003 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 65 (2):383-383.
Proofs for the Existence of God.Lawrence Nolan & Alan Nelson - 2006 - In Lawrence Nolan & Alan Nelson, Proofs for the Existence of God. Blackwell. pp. 104--121.
The Ontological Argument as an Exercise in Cartesian Therapy.Lawrence Nolan - 2005 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (4):521 - 562.
Descartes' Knowledge of God in the Fifth Meditation.Stanley Tweyman - 1988 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):263-273.
The Ontological Status of Cartesian Natures.Lawrence Nolan - 1997 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (2):169–194.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-15

Downloads
668 (#41,599)

6 months
65 (#91,174)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jesus A. Diaz
Brown University (PhD)

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references