- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
We Don’t Offer What Can’t Be Chosen: Why Harmful Consequences Should Not Be “Decisive” in Assessing Decision-Making
American Journal of Bioethics 22 (10):60-62 (2022)
Abstract
In this Open Peer Commentary, we draw on our clinical experience to argue that instrumental paternalism carves a pathway to competent refusal of medical intervention. Whether C successfully navigat...Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Do we need a threshold conception of competence?Govert den Hartogh - 2016 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 19 (1):71-83.
Why Even a Liberal Can Justify Limited Paternalistic Intervention in Anorexia Nervosa.Jennifer Hawkins - 2021 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 28 (2):155-158.
The Value of Value in Decision-Making Competence Assessments.Isaac Atley - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (10):81-83.
The Default Position: Optimizing Pediatric Participation in Medical Decision Making.Aleksandra E. Olszewski & Sara F. Goldkind - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (3):4-9.
Harmful Choices, the Case of C, and Decision-Making Competence.Neil Pickering, GIles Newton-Howes & Greg Young - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (10):38-50.
Expanding Our Thoughts about Autonomy in Relation to Whether We Should Offer Genetic Testing for Nonmedical Traits.Kelly E. Ormond - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (3):21-23.
Hard paternalism, fairness and clinical research: why not?Sarah J. L. Edwards & James Wilson - 2010 - Bioethics 26 (2):68 - 75.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Responding to Those Who Hope for a Miracle: Practices for Clinical Bioethicists”.Trevor M. Bibler, Myrick C. Shinall & Devan Stahl - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (5):W1-W5.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-09-29
Downloads
16 (#1,198,632)
6 months
5 (#1,059,814)
2022-09-29
Downloads
16 (#1,198,632)
6 months
5 (#1,059,814)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Principles of Biomedical Ethics: Marking Its Fortieth Anniversary.James Childress & Tom Beauchamp - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (11):9-12.
Clinical Ethics: A Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine.Henry Aranow, Albert R. Jonsen, Mark Siegler & William J. Winslade - 1983 - Hastings Center Report 13 (1):32.
Harmful Choices, the Case of C, and Decision-Making Competence.Neil Pickering, GIles Newton-Howes & Greg Young - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (10):38-50.
The Consent Continuum: A New Model of Consent, Assent, and Nondissent for Primary Care.Marc Tunzi, David J. Satin & Philip G. Day - 2021 - Hastings Center Report 51 (2):33-40.
Utilizing Community Research Committees to Improve the Informed Consent Process.Marc Tunzi, Robert P. Lennon, David Satin & Philip G. Day - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (5):73-75.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-xlp8h uwo