Better theories are needed to distinguish perception from cognition

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):374-375 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pylyshyn argues that many of the methods used to study perception are too coarse to detect the distinction between perceptual and cognitive processing. We suggest that the reason for this is that the theories used to guide research in perception are at fault. More powerful theories – for instance, computer simulations – will be required to identify where perception ends and where cognition begins

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Vision and cognition: Drawing the line.Andrew Hollingworth & John M. Henderson - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):380-381.
Defining perception and cognition.Dennis J. McFarland & Anthony T. Cacace - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):385-385.
The perception/cognition distinction.Sebastian Watzl, Kristoffer Sundberg & Anders Nes - 2021 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 66 (2):165-195.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
71 (#296,516)

6 months
17 (#175,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references