The merits of an experimentally testable model of phobias

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):363-364 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A series of arguments are presented by De Jong & Merckelbach which suggest that biological preparedness has been received significantly less critically than it should have been. I agree fully with their assessment. Cuthbert raises four questions about the applicability of the expectancy bias hypothesis to selective associations in human conditioning. This response argues that none of these four examples is necessarily problematic for the hypothesis

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,026

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Natural selection and fear regulation mechanisms.Randolph M. Nesse & James L. Abelson - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (2):309-310.
The generalized expectancy bias: An explanatory enigma.Joseph J. Plaud - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (2):311-312.
Did residual normality ever have a chance?Susan C. Levine, Terry Regier & Tracy L. Solomon - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):759-760.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
42 (#582,019)

6 months
19 (#155,036)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references