Eighteen rules for writing a code of professional ethics

Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (2):171-189 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Most professional societies, scientific associations, and the like that undertake to write a code of ethics do so using other codes as models but without much (practical) guidance about how to do the work. The existing literature on codes is much more concerned with content than procedure. This paper adds to guidance already in the literature what I learned from participating in the writing of an important code of ethics. The guidance is given in the form of “rules” each of which is explained and (insofar as possible) justified. The emphasis is on procedure.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,748

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What can we learn by looking for the first code of professional ethics?Michael Davis - 2003 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (5):433-454.
Why comply with a code of ethics?Georg Spielthenner - 2015 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (2):195-202.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
177 (#139,859)

6 months
14 (#213,080)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Davis
State University of New York at Buffalo