Can we do without fundamental individuals? Yes

In Elizabeth B. Barnes, Current controversies in metaphysics. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. pp. 7-23 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,804

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Can we do without fundamental individuals? No.Jason Turner - 2017 - In Elizabeth B. Barnes, Current controversies in metaphysics. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. pp. 24-34.
Are There States of Affairs? Yes.Daniel Nolan - 2014 - In Elizabeth B. Barnes, Current Controversies in Metaphysics. New York: Routledge. pp. 81-91.
Identifying Primitive Individuals.David Wörner - 2024 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 11.
Dasgupta, Shamik 123 n5 Davidson, Donald 219, 219 n10, 223, 225-6, 244 n12.Peter Achinstein - 2012 - In Fabrice Correia & Benjamin Schnieder, Metaphysical grounding: understanding the structure of reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 306.
Is evolution fundamental when it comes to defining biological ontology? Yes.Ellen Clarke - 2017 - In Shamik Dasgupta, Brad Weslake & Ravit Dotan, Current Controversies in Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge.
Do Ordinary Objects Exist? No.Trenton Merricks - 2014 - In Elizabeth B. Barnes, Current Controversies in Metaphysics. New York: Routledge.
A note on Dasgupta’s Generalism.Joshua Babic & Lorenzo Cocco - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (8):2153-2162.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-03-16

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Shamik Dasgupta
University of California, Berkeley

Citations of this work

Haecceitism and Symmetry-Breaking: Things, Time, and Powers.Daniel S. Murphy - forthcoming - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy.
Facts.Kevin Mulligan - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Haecceitism.Sam Cowling - 2015 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references