Holism and its Consequences

In Ethics without principles. New York: Oxford University Press (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Gives the best argument for holism in the theory of reasons, and then considers how best to establish ethical particularism on that basis. Also considers various ways of accepting holism without going so far as the particularist wants to go.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,934

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethics without reasons?Roger Crisp - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (1):40-49.
Ethics without principles.Jonathan Dancy - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Crisp's ‘ethics without reasons?’: A note on invariance.Edward Harcourt - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (1):50-54.
Can Holism be True?Jonathan Dancy - 2004 - In Ethics without principles. New York: Oxford University Press.
Principles of Rational Valuing.Jonathan Dancy - 2004 - In Ethics without principles. New York: Oxford University Press.
Why Sibley is Not a Generalist After All.Anna Bergqvist - 2010 - British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (1):1-14.
Ruling Reasons: A Defense of Moral Generalism.Pekka Väyrynen - 2002 - Dissertation, Cornell University

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
16 (#1,207,565)

6 months
15 (#221,138)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jonathan Dancy
University of Texas at Austin

Citations of this work

An Honest Display of Fakery: Replicas and the Role of Museums.Constantine Sandis - 2016 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 79:241-259.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references