Why Only Us? Language and Evolution

Analysis 78 (2):381-383 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Why Only Us? Language and Evolution By BerwickRobert C. and ChomskyNoamMassachusetts Institute of Technology, 2015. 224 pp. £17.95 paper.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/analys/any018

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Why Only Us: Language and Evolution. [REVIEW]Thomas Klikauer - 2017 - The European Legacy 22 (4):496-497.
Why Only Us? Language and Evolution By Robert C. Berwick and Noam Chomsky.Chris Daly - forthcoming - Analysis:any018.
Why Only Us? Language and Evolution . By Robert C.Berwick and NoamChomsky. Pp. vii, 215, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2016, $14.35. [REVIEW]Benjamin Murphy - 2019 - Heythrop Journal 60 (1):113-114.
Placing universal grammar on the agenda of evolutionary linguistics?: Robert C. Berwick and Noam Chomsky: Why only us: language and evolution. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2016, vii+215pp, $22.95 HB.Nathalie Gontier - 2017 - Metascience 26 (1):107-111.
The evolution of syntactic structure. [REVIEW]Richard Moore - 2017 - Biology and Philosophy 32 (4):599-613.
How language couldn’t have evolved: a critical examination of Berwick and Chomsky’s theory of language evolution.Ronald J. Planer - 2017 - Biology and Philosophy 32 (6):779-796.
Prefrontal cortex and symbol learning: Why a brain capable of language evolved only once.Terrence W. Deacon - 1996 - In B. Velichkovsky & Duane M. Rumbaugh (eds.), Communicating Meaning: The Evolution and Development of Language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 103--138.
Why and how the problem of the evolution of universal grammar (UG) is hard.Stevan Harnad - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (5):524-525.
On externalization and cognitive continuity in language evolution.W. Tecumseh Fitch - 2017 - Mind and Language 32 (5):597-606.
How is Language Possible?: Philosophical Reflections on the Evolution of Language and Knowledge J. N. Hattiangadi La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1987. Pp. xxi, 224. $29.95, $13.95 paper. [REVIEW]Stewart Nicolson - 1989 - Dialogue 28 (3):512-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-03

Downloads
44 (#508,899)

6 months
9 (#500,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What You Can Do for Evolutionary Developmental Linguistics.William C. Bausman & Marcel Weber - 2024 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 15 (1):1-18.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

On the Plurality of Worlds.David K. Lewis - 1986 - Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism.David Enoch - 2011 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
On The Plurality of Worlds.Graeme Forbes - 1988 - Philosophical Quarterly 38 (151):222-240.
What is the Benacerraf Problem?Justin Clarke-Doane - 2017 - In Fabrice Pataut Jody Azzouni, Paul Benacerraf Justin Clarke-Doane, Jacques Dubucs Sébastien Gandon, Brice Halimi Jon Perez Laraudogoitia, Mary Leng Ana Leon-Mejia, Antonio Leon-Sanchez Marco Panza, Fabrice Pataut Philippe de Rouilhan & Andrea Sereni Stuart Shapiro (eds.), New Perspectives on the Philosophy of Paul Benacerraf: Truth, Objects, Infinity (Fabrice Pataut, Editor). Springer.
Anti-luck epistemology.Duncan Pritchard - 2007 - Synthese 158 (3):277-297.

View all 11 references / Add more references