Good Science, Bad Science, Pseudoscience, and Just Plain Bunk: How to Tell the Difference

Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Good Science, Bad Science, Pseudoscience, and Just Plain Bunk teaches readers to think like scientists—to critically evaluate the truth of scientific claims. Filled with provocative real-life examples, from the effects of Bisphenol-A to examining some of the alleged causes of cancer, the book helps readers build their tools of scientific literacy

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,621

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is transhumanism good science, bad science, or pseudoscience?Arvin M. Gouw - 2022 - In Arvin M. Gouw, Brian Patrick Green & Ted Peters, Religious Transhumanism and Its Critics. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Is transhumanism good science, bad science, or pseudoscience?Arvin M. Gouw - 2022 - In Arvin M. Gouw, Brian Patrick Green & Ted Peters, Religious Transhumanism and Its Critics. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Just a theory: exploring the nature of science.M. Ben-Ari - 2005 - Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books.
Incorrigible Science and Doctrinal Pseudoscience.Kåre Letrud - 2022 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 35 (3-4):269-278.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-06

Downloads
48 (#511,977)

6 months
2 (#1,362,696)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references