Translation and belief

Analysis 42 (1):12-16 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I present a formally explicit statement of Church's celebrated argument against Carnap's analysis of belief and defend it against well-known objections by W.V.O. Quine, R.M. Martin, and Michael Dummett.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-05-04

Downloads
108 (#197,762)

6 months
12 (#302,973)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Toward an Epistemology of Art.Arnold Cusmariu - 2016 - Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 3 (1):37-64.
The Cogito Paradox.Arnold Cusmariu - forthcoming - Symposion. Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences.
Lifting the church-ban on quotational analysis: The translation argument and the use-mention distinction. [REVIEW]Diederik Olders & Peter Sas - 2001 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 32 (2):257-270.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references