Amor, ch’a nullo amante amar perdona…

Abstract

In the Symposium, Plato states that love is desire to know. Both philosophy and psychoanalysis regard love as relating to the subject’s identity, to the relationship with others, and to the relationship to death. This article investigates the first two aspects, in order to look for the origin and the deep meaning of the apparently paradoxical manifestations of love. After examining the contributions of Hegel, Schopenhauer, Freud, Lacan, and Barthes, three claims are put forward: 1. in love desire is always satisfied in a hallucinatory way; 2. this gives rise to a reversal of identity between the lover and the beloved ; 3. it is not lack that creates desire, rather, it is the desire that creates lack. Giovanni Gentile’s position on love provides a way to confirm this last thesis.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,836

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-27

Downloads
4 (#1,833,067)

6 months
1 (#1,599,946)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references