Paradox, Will and Religious Belief

Philosophy 66 (258):503 - 511 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In its central object of attachment—the figure of Christ Incarnate—the Christian religion could be said to embrace what would ordinarily be taken to be an impossible object of belief. That is, the logic of the Incarnation demands close scrutiny: and in response, the question may be begged, given such an analysis of that life, may not any belief which does take this figure to be a central object of faith, be then held to be sui generis , a logically extraordinary form of belief?

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Paradox, will and religious belief, Charles Gurrey.Amelie Oksenberg Rorty - 1991 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (3).
On the Tragedy of Philosopher’s Belief.Baichun Zhang - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 45:373-378.
Evidence and Religious Belief.Raymond VanArragon & Kelly James Clark (eds.) - 2011 - Oxford, US: Oxford University Press.
Belief, faith, and acceptance.Robert Audi - 2008 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 63 (1):87-102.
Conceptual representation of belief systems.Cornelis Wegman - 1981 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 11 (3):279–305.
The Ethics of Religious Belief.Elizabeth Jackson - 2021 - Religious Studies Archives 1 (4):1-10.
Faith Without Belief?Louis Pojman - 1986 - Faith and Philosophy 3 (2):157-176.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
37 (#609,859)

6 months
10 (#407,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Postmodernism—a cross-cultural perspective.P. J. Hiett - 1995 - Asian Philosophy 5 (2):197 – 208.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references