Form and Universal in Boethius

British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (3):439-458 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contrary to the claims of recent commentators, I argue that Boethius holds a modified version of the Ammonian three-fold universal (transcendent, immanent, and conceptual). He probably identifies transcendent universals as divine ideas, and accepts too forms immanent in corporeal particulars, most likely construing these along the Aphrodisian lines that he hints at in a well-known passage from his second commentary on Porphyry's Isagoge. Boethius never states the theory of the three-fold form outright, but I attempt to show that this theory nevertheless underlies and gives structure to what Boethius has to say on the topic

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-05-30

Downloads
88 (#237,648)

6 months
13 (#253,178)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Cross
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

The Semantics of Divine Esse in Boethius.Elliot Polsky - 2024 - Nova et Vetera 22 (4):1215-1264.
Aquinas on the Intension and Remission of Accidental Forms.Gloria Frost - 2019 - Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 7 (1).
Boethius’ta Tanrı, Sıfatları Ve Teleolojik Delil.Tuncay Akgün - 2015 - Dini Araştırmalar 18 (46):126-147.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The medieval problem of universals.Gyula Klima - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more references